[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <534CE999.10209@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:11:05 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
'Christoffer Dall' <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'linux-samsung-soc' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"sungjinn.chung@...sung.com" <sungjinn.chung@...sung.com>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
"kgene.kim@...sung.com" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"ilho215.lee@...sung.com" <ilho215.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix line length exceeding 80 characters
On 15/04/14 01:38, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:19 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 14/04/14 08:40, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>>> This patch deals with checkpatch complaint as fixing line length
>>> exceeding 80 characters.
>>>
>>> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <sungjinn.chung@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c index
>>> 80bb1e6..e0d4f24 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>>> - phys_addr_t addr)
>>> +static pmd_t *stage2_get_pmd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
>>> + *cache, phys_addr_t addr)
>>
>> Please don't. This makes the code unreadable (and no, I don't care about checkpatch ;-).
>
> Okay. I will drop this patch from the next version.
>
> It would be good to change stage2_set_pmd_huge function for readability
> if you don't care about checkpatch.
We usually don't change that kind of thing just for the sake of changing
it. It feels like fairly pointless churn. *IF* someone happens to rework
that code, then they're welcome to fix it.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists