| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140415105138.GO11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:51:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@....ntt.co.jp>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nohz: Synchronize sleep time stats with memory
barriers
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:17:52PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> When some call site uses get_cpu_*_time_us() to read a sleeptime
> stat, it deduces the total sleeptime by adding the pending time
> to the last sleeptime snapshot if the CPU target is idle.
>
> But this only works if idle_sleeptime, idle_entrytime and idle_active are
> read and updated under some disciplined order.
>
> This patch changes updaters to modify idle_entrytime,
> {idle,iowait}_sleeptime, and idle_active exactly in this order,
> with write barriers on SMP to ensure other CPUs see then in this order too.
> Readers are changed read them in the opposite order, with read barriers.
> When readers detect a race by seeing cleared idle_entrytime,
> they retry the reads.
>
> The "iowait-ness" of every idle period is decided at the moment it starts:
> if this CPU's run-queue had tasks waiting on I/O, then this idle
> period's duration will be added to iowait_sleeptime.
> This, along with proper SMP syncronization, fixes the bug where iowait
> counts could go backwards.
It also makes for a near infinite source of iowait. Who is to say the
CPU that started with iowait will ever wake up? The nohz sleep time is
practically unbounded.
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 73ced0c4..ed0c1bd 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -409,10 +409,15 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_idle(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
>
> /* Updates the per cpu time idle statistics counters */
> delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
> + ts->idle_entrytime.tv64 = 0;
One must at all times describe the memory ordering and pairing barrier
in a comment when placing barriers.
> + smp_wmb();
> +
> + if (ts->idle_active == 2)
> ts->iowait_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->iowait_sleeptime, delta);
> else
> ts->idle_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
> +
> + smp_wmb();
> ts->idle_active = 0;
>
> sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(0);
> @@ -423,7 +428,8 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(struct tick_sched *ts)
> ktime_t now = ktime_get();
>
> ts->idle_entrytime = now;
> + smp_wmb();
> + ts->idle_active = nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) ? 2 : 1;
> sched_clock_idle_sleep_event();
> return now;
> }
> @@ -444,25 +450,44 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(struct tick_sched *ts)
> */
> u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time)
> {
> + struct tick_sched *ts;
> + ktime_t now, count;
> + int active;
>
> if (!tick_nohz_active)
> return -1;
>
> + ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> +
> now = ktime_get();
> if (last_update_time)
> *last_update_time = ktime_to_us(now);
>
> + again:
> + active = ACCESS_ONCE(ts->idle_active);
> + smp_rmb();
> + count = ACCESS_ONCE(ts->idle_sleeptime);
> + if (active == 1) {
> + ktime_t delta, start;
> +
> + smp_rmb();
> + start = ACCESS_ONCE(ts->idle_entrytime);
> + if (start.tv64 == 0)
> + /* Other CPU is updating the count.
> + * We don't know whether fetched count is valid.
> + */
> + goto again;
This is double wrong; any multi line stmt (even if its a single stmt)
should have {}. Also, wrong multi line comment style.
> +
> + delta = ktime_sub(now, start);
> + count = ktime_add(count, delta);
> } else {
> + /* Possible concurrent tick_nohz_stop_idle() already
> + * cleared idle_active. We fetched count *after*
> + * we fetched idle_active, so count must be valid.
> + */
Wrong comment style again.
> }
>
> + return ktime_to_us(count);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cpu_idle_time_us);
>
> @@ -482,24 +507,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cpu_idle_time_us);
> */
> u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time)
> {
> + struct tick_sched *ts;
> + ktime_t now, count;
> + int active;
>
> if (!tick_nohz_active)
> return -1;
>
> + ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> +
> now = ktime_get();
> if (last_update_time)
> *last_update_time = ktime_to_us(now);
>
> + again:
> + active = ACCESS_ONCE(ts->idle_active);
> + smp_rmb();
> + count = ACCESS_ONCE(ts->iowait_sleeptime);
> + if (active == 2) {
> + ktime_t delta, start;
> +
> + smp_rmb();
> + start = ACCESS_ONCE(ts->idle_entrytime);
> + if (start.tv64 == 0)
> + /* Other CPU is updating the count.
> + * We don't know whether fetched count is valid.
> + */
> + goto again;
> +
> + delta = ktime_sub(now, start);
> + count = ktime_add(count, delta);
> } else {
> + /* Possible concurrent tick_nohz_stop_idle() already
> + * cleared idle_active. We fetched count *after*
> + * we fetched idle_active, so count must be valid.
> + */
> }
You're not nearly lazy enough; this is a near identical copy of the
above, two nearly identical copies of 'tricky' code is a bad idea.
>
> + return ktime_to_us(count);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cpu_iowait_time_us);
So the proposed ordering is something like:
[w] ->idle_entrytime = 0
WMB /* k0 <-> r1 */
[w] ->*_sleeptime += delta
WMB /* k1 <-> r0 */
[w] ->idle_active = 0
VS
[w] ->idle_entrytime = now
WMB /* s0 <-> r0 */
[w] ->idle_active = 1 + !!nr_iowait
VS
[r] active = ->idle_active
RMB /* r0 <-> s0, k1 */
[r] count = ->idle_sleeptime
RMB /* r1 <-> k0 */
[r] start = ->idle_entrytime
Which on first reading seems sound enough; but needs more words to
describe why.
That said; I thing the fundamental flaw in the entire thing is
accounting the entire nohz idle period as one type, since the period is
basically unbounded.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists