lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1397566023.29169.31.camel@AMDC1943>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:47:03 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix stall after CPU
 hotplugging

On wto, 2014-04-15 at 14:28 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 11:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On piÄ…, 2014-03-28 at 14:06 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Fix stall after hotplugging CPU1. Affected are SoCs where Multi Core Timer
> >> interrupts are shared (SPI), e.g. Exynos 4210. The stall was a result of
> >> starting the CPU1 local timer not in L1 timer but in L0 (which is used
> >> by CPU0).
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do you have any comments on these 3 patches? They fix the CPU stall on
> > Exynos4210 and also on Exynos3250 (Chanwoo Choi sent patches for it
> > recently).
> 
> You describe this issue as impacting different SoC not only the exynos, 
> right ?
>
> Do you know what other SoCs are impacted by this ?

No, affected are only Exynos SoC-s. It was confirmed on Exynos4210
(Trats board) and Exynos3250 (new SoC, patches for it were recently
posted by Chanwoo).

Other Exynos SoC-s where MCT local timers use shared interrupts (SPI)
can also be affected. Candidates are Exynos 5250 and 5420 but I haven't
tested them.

> I guess this issue is not reproducible just with the line below, we need 
> a timer to expire right at the moment CPU1 is hotplugged, right ?

Right. The timer must fire in short time between enabling local timer
for CPU1 and setting the affinity for IRQ.

In my case on ~1 GHz 2 core CPU (during idle state, system booted with
init=/bin/sh)  it was easily triggered with:

for i in `seq 200`; do
	echo 0 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online
	echo 1 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online
	sleep 1
done

The stall happened typically after 10-30 seconds of such test.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> >> Trigger:
> >> $ echo 0 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online && echo 1 > /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu1/online
> >>
> >> Stall information:
> >> [  530.045259] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> >> [  530.045618]  1: (6 GPs behind) idle=6d0/0/0 softirq=369/369
> >> [  530.050987]  (detected by 0, t=6589 jiffies, g=33, c=32, q=0)
> >> [  530.056721] Task dump for CPU 1:
> >> [  530.059928] swapper/1       R running      0     0      1 0x00001000
> >> [  530.066377] [<c0524e14>] (__schedule+0x414/0x9b4) from [<c00b6610>] (rcu_idle_enter+0x18/0x38)
> >> [  530.074955] [<c00b6610>] (rcu_idle_enter+0x18/0x38) from [<c0079a18>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x3bc)
> >> [  530.084069] [<c0079a18>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x60/0x3bc) from [<c0517d34>] (secondary_start_kernel+0x164/0x1a0)
> >> [  530.094029] [<c0517d34>] (secondary_start_kernel+0x164/0x1a0) from [<40517244>] (0x40517244)
> >>
> >> The timers for CPU1 were missed:
> >> [  591.668436] cpu: 1
> >> [  591.670430]  clock 0:
> >> [  591.672691]   .base:       c0ab7750
> >> [  591.676160]   .index:      0
> >> [  591.679025]   .resolution: 1 nsecs
> >> [  591.682404]   .get_time:   ktime_get
> >> [  591.685970]   .offset:     0 nsecs
> >> [  591.689349] active timers:
> >> [  591.692045]  #0: <dfb51f40>, hrtimer_wakeup, S:01
> >> [  591.696759]  # expires at 454687834257-454687884257 nsecs [in -136770537232 to -136770487232 nsecs]
> >>
> >> And the event_handler for next event was wrong:
> >> [  591.917120] Tick Device: mode:     1
> >> [  591.920676] Per CPU device: 0
> >> [  591.923621] Clock Event Device: mct_tick0
> >> [  591.927623]  max_delta_ns:   178956969027
> >> [  591.931613]  min_delta_ns:   1249
> >> [  591.934913]  mult:           51539608
> >> [  591.938557]  shift:          32
> >> [  591.941681]  mode:           3
> >> [  591.944724]  next_event:     595025000000 nsecs
> >> [  591.949227]  set_next_event: exynos4_tick_set_next_event
> >> [  591.954522]  set_mode:       exynos4_tick_set_mode
> >> [  591.959296]  event_handler:  hrtimer_interrupt
> >> [  591.963730]  retries:        0
> >> [  591.966761]
> >> [  591.968245] Tick Device: mode:     0
> >> [  591.971801] Per CPU device: 1
> >> [  591.974746] Clock Event Device: mct_tick1
> >> [  591.978750]  max_delta_ns:   178956969027
> >> [  591.982739]  min_delta_ns:   1249
> >> [  591.986037]  mult:           51539608
> >> [  591.989681]  shift:          32
> >> [  591.992806]  mode:           3
> >> [  591.995848]  next_event:     453685000000 nsecs
> >> [  592.000353]  set_next_event: exynos4_tick_set_next_event
> >> [  592.005648]  set_mode:       exynos4_tick_set_mode
> >> [  592.010421]  event_handler:  tick_handle_periodic
> >> [  592.015115]  retries:        0
> >> [  592.018145]
> >>
> >> After turning off the CPU1, the MCT L1 local timer was disabled but the
> >> interrupt was not cleared. Turning on the CPU1 enabled the IRQ
> >> with setup_irq() but, before setting affinity to CPU1, the pending L1 timer
> >> interrupt was processed by CPU0 in exynos4_mct_tick_isr().
> >>
> >> The ISR then called event handler which set up the next timer event for
> >> current CPU (CPU0). Therefore the MCT L1 timer wasn't actually started.
> >>
> >> Fix the stall by:
> >> 1. Setting next timer event not on current CPU but on the CPU indicated
> >>     by cpumask in 'clock_event_device'.
> >> 2. Clearing the timer interrupt upon stopping the local timer.
> >>
> >> The patch also moves around the call to exynos4_mct_tick_stop() but this
> >> is done only for the code readability as it is not essential for the fix.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> >> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> >> index 48f76bc05da0..0b49b09dd1a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> >> @@ -339,7 +339,14 @@ static void exynos4_mct_tick_start(unsigned long cycles,
> >>   static int exynos4_tick_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
> >>   				       struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >>   {
> >> -	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * In case of hotplugging non-boot CPU, the set_next_event could be
> >> +	 * called on CPU0 by ISR before IRQ affinity is set to proper CPU.
> >> +	 * Thus for accessing proper MCT Lx timer, 'per_cpu' for cpumask
> >> +	 * in event must be used instead of 'this_cpu_ptr'.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = &per_cpu(percpu_mct_tick,
> >> +			cpumask_first(evt->cpumask));
> >>
> >>   	exynos4_mct_tick_start(cycles, mevt);
> >>
> >> @@ -371,23 +378,13 @@ static inline void exynos4_tick_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> >>
> >>   static int exynos4_mct_tick_clear(struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt)
> >>   {
> >> -	struct clock_event_device *evt = &mevt->evt;
> >> -
> >> -	/*
> >> -	 * This is for supporting oneshot mode.
> >> -	 * Mct would generate interrupt periodically
> >> -	 * without explicit stopping.
> >> -	 */
> >> -	if (evt->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC)
> >> -		exynos4_mct_tick_stop(mevt);
> >> -
> >>   	/* Clear the MCT tick interrupt */
> >>   	if (__raw_readl(reg_base + mevt->base + MCT_L_INT_CSTAT_OFFSET) & 1) {
> >>   		exynos4_mct_write(0x1, mevt->base + MCT_L_INT_CSTAT_OFFSET);
> >>   		return 1;
> >> -	} else {
> >> -		return 0;
> >>   	}
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   static irqreturn_t exynos4_mct_tick_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >> @@ -395,6 +392,13 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos4_mct_tick_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >>   	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = dev_id;
> >>   	struct clock_event_device *evt = &mevt->evt;
> >>
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * This is for supporting oneshot mode.
> >> +	 * Mct would generate interrupt periodically
> >> +	 * without explicit stopping.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (evt->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC)
> >> +		exynos4_mct_tick_stop(mevt);
> >>   	exynos4_mct_tick_clear(mevt);
> >>
> >>   	evt->event_handler(evt);
> >> @@ -441,7 +445,10 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >>
> >>   static void exynos4_local_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >>   {
> >> +	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> >> +
> >>   	evt->set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, evt);
> >> +	exynos4_mct_tick_clear(mevt);
> >>   	if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI)
> >>   		free_irq(evt->irq, this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick));
> >>   	else
> >
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ