[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140415135326.GV11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:53:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] sched/core: Skip wakeup when task is already running.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:32:53PM +0900, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> From: Dongsheng <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> It is pointless to wake up a running task. Currently, we can
> see it in perf sched latency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 268a45e..fc6b644 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1416,6 +1416,9 @@ static void ttwu_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
> static void
> ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
> {
> + if (p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
> + return;
> +
> check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags);
> trace_sched_wakeup(p, true);
>
How can you get there with ->state == RUNNING? try_to_wake_up*() bail
when !(->state & state).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists