linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Set ocr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:09:53 -0700
From:	Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Linux MMC Mailing List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Set ocr_avail directly based on vmmc

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:

> I have seen some patches around lately touching the code for handling
> the regulators (vcc and vccq) in sdhci.

Was it this patch you were thinking of or something else?

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg25640.html

> A few times I have suggested to switch to use the
> mmc_regulator_get_supply() API to simplify and consolidate code. Could
> you please have a look at that?

This function will solve my problem but it also suggests that SDHCI
drivers should use the vmmc/vqmmc pointers in the mmc_host struct
rather than the ones in the sdhci_host struct.

Is this your intent?  Do you want to see the regulator pointers in the
sdhci_host struct removed once all drivers are modified to use the
mmc_host ones?

-Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/