linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <534CA050.8060709@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:58:24 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy

on 2014/4/15 3:21, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> So is this an intermediate mode before we move to single hiearchy *only*
>> mode. AFAIK, you had mentioned that we will support legacy multiple
>> hiearchy mode but single hiearchy is the new default mode.
> 
> Hmmm?  It's a separate special hierarchy which can co-exist with other
> hierarchies.  There's no inherent intermediacy to it.  As long as
> traditional hierarchies exist, it's gonna be like this.
> 

I know we should allow multiple hierarchies, but why we allow this even
if sane_behavior is specified?

Like this:

# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset,__DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup
# mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup2/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/