[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404152028560.22697@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:30:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, Arvind.Chauhan@....com,
linaro-networking@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 Resend 2/5] tick-common: don't check tick_oneshot_mode_active()
from tick_check_preferred()
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> If 'curdev' passed to tick_check_preferred() is the current clock_event_device
> then these two checks look exactly same, because td->mode is set to
> TICKDEV_MODE_ONESHOT only when the event device has ONESHOT feature.
>
> if (curdev && (curdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT))
> return false;
>
> if (tick_oneshot_mode_active())
> return false;
>
> Now left the case where 'curdev' is not the current clock_event_device. This can
> happen from the sequence started from clockevents_replace(). Here we are trying
> to find the best possible device that we should choose. And so even in this case
> we don't need the above check as we aren't really worried about the current
> device.
Wrong. If curdev is NULL, you might select a device w/o ONESHOT if the
system is in oneshot mode. Go figure.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists