[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404151507290.15528@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:10:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Right, so the thing to do is to run a build with the commit applied,
> without any -j arguments and V=1, logging the output (so that predictable
> output can be generated).
>
> Then run the same thing with the commit reverted, again logging it. Then
> diff the two and see what's different.
OK, I captured the output. No diffs, as of course reverting things
means one kernel was called 3.15-rc1 and one 3.15-rc1+ which meant more or
less every line changed.
It seems that on stock 3.15-rc1 (which fails to build) after running
depmod it kicks into
restore_upstream_debianization
which goes down a path which causes the file permission failures
Wheras 3.15-rc1 with the problem commit reverted this doesn't happen.
This is a really weird bug, I've tried reverting individual hunks of the
problem commit manually and it is not clear at all to me what is
triggering this.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists