lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404151442380.29234@gentwo.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:47:05 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1

On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:

> > Then run the same thing with the commit reverted, again logging it.  Then
> > diff the two and see what's different.
>
> OK, I captured the output.  No diffs, as of course reverting things
> means one kernel was called 3.15-rc1 and one 3.15-rc1+ which meant more or
> less every line changed.

Well just add another fake patch and they both will have the same name...
The diff would be very helpful.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ