linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] REGRESSION 3.14 i915 warning & mouse cursor vanishing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1397591989.2715.18.camel@ideak-mobl>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 22:59:49 +0300
From:	Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] REGRESSION 3.14 i915 warning & mouse cursor
 vanishing

On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 21:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:56:03AM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:35:05AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Was using my machine normally, then my mouse cursor vanished. After switching
> > > > to a VT and back to X11, my cursor came back. But I did notice a nasty trace in
> > > > dmesg (below).
> > > 
> > > I don't think the trace below is related to the cursor disappearing.
> > 
> > Any idea what the trace is all about then? Seems it has something to do
> > with runtime power management (maybe my aggressive kernel command-line
> > options are triggering it).
> 
> Please test without them. Currently runtime pm should be disabled still on
> vlv (since it's incomplete in 3.14). If you've force-enabled that then you
> get to keep all pieces ;-)
> 
> In general don't set any i915 options if you're not a developer or someone
> else who _really_ knows what's going on.

Note that the lspci output and the

[ 1795.275026] [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_clear] *ERROR* Unknown unclaimed
register before writing to 70084

line suggests HSW and the specs for ThinkPad Yoga suggests the same. But
I don't know how the vlv_* functions can possible end up in those traces
then, perhaps just a coincidence, random data on stack?

For HSW the rc6 kernel option shouldn't make a difference.

--Imre  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/