[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1397598515-25017-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:48:35 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] thp: close race between split and zap huge pages
Sasha Levin has reported two THP BUGs[1][2]. I believe both of them have
the same root cause. Let's look to them one by one.
The first bug[1] is "kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1829!".
It's BUG_ON(mapcount != page_mapcount(page)) in __split_huge_page().
>From my testing I see that page_mapcount() is higher than mapcount here.
I think it happens due to race between zap_huge_pmd() and
page_check_address_pmd(). page_check_address_pmd() misses PMD
which is under zap:
CPU0 CPU1
zap_huge_pmd()
pmdp_get_and_clear()
__split_huge_page()
anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach()
__split_huge_page_splitting()
page_check_address_pmd()
mm_find_pmd()
/*
* We check if PMD present without taking ptl: no
* serialization against zap_huge_pmd(). We miss this PMD,
* it's not accounted to 'mapcount' in __split_huge_page().
*/
pmd_present(pmd) == 0
BUG_ON(mapcount != page_mapcount(page)) // CRASH!!!
page_remove_rmap(page)
atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount)
The second bug[2] is "kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1371!".
It's VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page) in zap_huge_pmd().
This happens in similar way:
CPU0 CPU1
zap_huge_pmd()
pmdp_get_and_clear()
page_remove_rmap(page)
atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount)
__split_huge_page()
anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach()
__split_huge_page_splitting()
page_check_address_pmd()
mm_find_pmd()
pmd_present(pmd) == 0 /* The same comment as above */
/*
* No crash this time since we already decremented page->_mapcount in
* zap_huge_pmd().
*/
BUG_ON(mapcount != page_mapcount(page))
/*
* We split the compound page here into small pages without
* serialization against zap_huge_pmd()
*/
__split_huge_page_refcount()
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page); // CRASH!!!
So my understanding the problem is pmd_present() check in mm_find_pmd()
without taking page table lock.
The bug was introduced by me commit with commit 117b0791ac42. Sorry for
that. :(
Let's open code mm_find_pmd() in page_check_address_pmd() and do the
check under page table lock.
Note that __page_check_address() does the same for PTE entires
if sync != 0.
I've stress tested split and zap code paths for 36+ hours by now and
don't see crashes with the patch applied. Before it took <20 min to
trigger the first bug and few hours for second one (if we ignore
first).
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/g/<53440991.9090001@...cle.com>
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/g/<5310C56C.60709@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> #3.13+
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 5025709bb3b5..d02a83852ee9 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1536,16 +1536,23 @@ pmd_t *page_check_address_pmd(struct page *page,
enum page_check_address_pmd_flag flag,
spinlock_t **ptl)
{
+ pgd_t *pgd;
+ pud_t *pud;
pmd_t *pmd;
if (address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK)
return NULL;
- pmd = mm_find_pmd(mm, address);
- if (!pmd)
+ pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
+ if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
return NULL;
+ pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
+ if (!pud_present(*pud))
+ return NULL;
+ pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
+
*ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
- if (pmd_none(*pmd))
+ if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
goto unlock;
if (pmd_page(*pmd) != page)
goto unlock;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists