linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: implement cgroup.subtree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPXgP12kvPdX0QExwN2JphDfEW=d+7K2c_Y8DbomGd=YVy=VGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:33:26 -0700
From:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	john@...nmccutchan.com, rlove@...ve.org, eparis@...isplace.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	serge.hallyn@...ntu.com,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: implement cgroup.subtree_populated for the
 default hierarchy

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 2014/4/15 5:44, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> cgroup users often need a way to determine when a cgroup's
>> subhierarchy becomes empty so that it can be cleaned up.  cgroup
>> currently provides release_agent for it; unfortunately, this mechanism
>> is riddled with issues.
>>
>> * It delivers events by forking and execing a userland binary
>>   specified as the release_agent.  This is a long deprecated method of
>>   notification delivery.  It's extremely heavy, slow and cumbersome to
>>   integrate with larger infrastructure.
>>
>> * There is single monitoring point at the root.  There's no way to
>>   delegate management of subtree.
>>
>> * The event isn't recursive.  It triggers when a cgroup doesn't have
>>   any tasks or child cgroups.  Events for internal nodes trigger only
>>   after all children are removed.  This again makes it impossible to
>>   delegate management of subtree.
>>
>> * Events are filtered from the kernel side.  "notify_on_release" file
>>   is used to subscribe to or suppress release event.  This is
>>   unnecessarily complicated and probably done this way because event
>>   delivery itself was expensive.
>>
>> This patch implements interface file "cgroup.subtree_populated" which
>> can be used to monitor whether the cgroup's subhierarchy has tasks in
>> it or not.  Its value is 0 if there is no task in the cgroup and its
>> descendants; otherwise, 1, and kernfs_notify() notificaiton is
>> triggers when the value changes, which can be monitored through poll
>> and [di]notify.
>>
>
> For the old notification mechanism, the path of the cgroup that becomes
> empty will be passed to the user specified release agent. Like this:
>
> # cat /sbin/cpuset_release_agent
> #!/bin/sh
> rmdir /dev/cpuset/$1
>
> How do we achieve this using inotify?
>
> - monitor all the cgroups, or
> - monitor all the leaf cgroups, and travel cgrp->parent to delete all
>   empty cgroups.
> - monitor root cgroup only, and travel the whole hierarchy to find
>   empy cgroups when it gets an fs event.
>
> Seems none of them is scalible.

The manager would add all cgroups as watches to one inotify file
descriptor, it should not be problem to do that.

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/