[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140416002245.GB5035@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:22:45 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>, lpoetter@...hat.com,
kay@...hat.com, dwalsh@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:54:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Implement SO_PEERCGROUP along the lines of SO_PEERCRED. This returns the
> > cgroup of first mounted hierarchy of the task. For the case of client,
> > it represents the cgroup of client at the time of opening the connection.
> > After that client cgroup might change.
> >
> > This works only for unix stream sockets.
>
> I still don't understand why this is useful when SCM_CGROUP exists.
I think this is more lightweight as compared to SCM_CGROUP. Information
is stored per connection as opposed to per message.
So if user space has created a system where unpriviliged processed have
been locked in cgroups and they can't escape those cgroups, then
SO_PEERCRED should be sufficient and one does not have to use SCM_CGROUP.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists