[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140416084236.GA23247@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:42:36 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: close race between split and zap huge pages
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 07:52:29AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> > *ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
> > - if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> > + if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
> > goto unlock;
>
> But I didn't get the idea why pmd_none() was removed?
!pmd_present(*pmd) is weaker check then pmd_none(*pmd). I mean if
pmd_none(*pmd) is true then pmd_present(*pmd) is always false.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists