lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140416090511.GB12866@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:05:11 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Cc:	管雪涛 <gxt@....edu.cn>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	liuj97@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch:unicore32:mm: add devmem_is_allowed() to support
 STRICT_DEVMEM

On Tue 15-04-14 09:21:30, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/io.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/io.h
> index 39decb6..ae327e4 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/io.h

There is already quite a mess where the function is defined. We have it
in mmap.c, init.c, mem.c and s390 defines it in page.h. Is there any
good reason to add yet another place and pull in additional header files
dependencies?
Why not follow x86 here? Or even better git rid of the code duplication
and provide generic implementation which different arches can reuse and
extend? arm{64}, unicore32 seem to be identical. Powepc and x86 have an
additional test to the core one used by the above arches. Only tile
seems to be be doing something completely different.

> @@ -44,5 +44,28 @@ extern void __uc32_iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr);
>  #define PIO_MASK		(unsigned int)(IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
>  #define PIO_RESERVED		(PIO_OFFSET + PIO_MASK + 1)
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM
> +
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * devmem_is_allowed() checks to see if /dev/mem access to a certain
> + * address is valid. The argument is a physical page number.
> + * We mimic x86 here by disallowing access to system RAM as well as
> + * device-exclusive MMIO regions. This effectively disable read()/write()
> + * on /dev/mem.
> + */
> +static inline int devmem_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> +	if (iomem_is_exclusive(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (!page_is_ram(pfn))
> +		return 1;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM */
> +
>  #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
>  #endif	/* __UNICORE_IO_H__ */
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ