[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140416132716.GA1001@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:27:16 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Cc: "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"eparis@...hat.com" <eparis@...hat.com>,
"rgb@...hat.com" <rgb@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"dsaxena@...aro.org" <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
"arndb@...db.de" <arndb@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-audit@...hat.com" <linux-audit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: split syscall_trace() into separate
functions for enter/exit
Hi Akashi,
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:39:06AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> As done in arm, this change makes it easy to confirm we invoke syscall
> related hooks, including syscall tracepoint, audit and seccomp which would
> be implemented later, in correct order. That is, undoing operations in the
> opposite order on exit that they were done on entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
[...]
> +static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
> + enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)
> {
> + int scrach;
s/scrach/scratch/
Although, I'd rather have a variable with a more meaningful name. How about
regno?
With that,
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cheers,
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists