[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <534EB17D.6090307@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:36:13 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Seunghun Lee <waydi1@...il.com>
CC: greg@...ah.com, swetland@...gle.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging : android : uapi : fix coding style
On 04/16/2014 07:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 23:27 +0900, Seunghun Lee wrote:
>> This patch fix checkpatch.pl warnings and errors.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/uapi/binder.h b/drivers/staging/android/uapi/binder.h
> []
>> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ struct binder_ptr_cookie {
>> struct binder_handle_cookie {
>> __u32 handle;
>> binder_uintptr_t cookie;
>> -} __attribute__((packed));
>> +} __packed;
> If this .h file is meant to be a user-space #include,
> then it should not use the kernel specific __packed
> but keep the __attribute__((packed))
Agreed.
> It does use __u32 though and that's generally
> kernel specific.
Hmm. Theres a ton of __u32 usage in include/uapi/* as well as typedefs
for it too.
include/uapi/asm-generic/int-l64.h:typedef unsigned int __u32;
include/uapi/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:typedef unsigned int __u32;
> John? Does any of these binder uapi files need a
> bit more sorting out?
I suspect this is ok, but Cc'ing Colin to give him a heads up, as it
would probably cause trouble w/ their libc headers first.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists