linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140416205136.GZ12304@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:51:36 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by
 adding retries

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:25:24AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs
> wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report
> overcurrent).  The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD

Please don't send new patches as replies in the middle of threads, it
makes it confusing trying to work out which versions of things should be
applied.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)