[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKHY_osEhE6HefV_PT+bXmv1vBWvCOY_93Sju0pbULoqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:33:44 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: delicious quinoa <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Alison Chaiken <Alison_Chaiken@...tor.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
Jan Lubbe <jluebbe@...net.de>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@....com>,
Michael Stickel <ms@...able.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>,
Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pete Popov <pete.popov@...sulko.com>,
Dan Malek <dan.malek@...sulko.com>,
Georgi Vlaev <georgi.vlaev@...sulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Introducing (yet again) Device Tree Overlays
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, delicious quinoa
<delicious.quinoa@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:40 PM, delicious quinoa
> <delicious.quinoa@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, delicious quinoa
>> <delicious.quinoa@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com> wrote:
>>>> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
>>>> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree, along with
>>>> a generic interface to use it in a board agnostic manner.
[snip]
>>> I can get a NULL pointer when I apply and remove an overlay and the
>>> conditions are right. The overlay applies correctly. The crash is
>>> when I do the rmdir. My overlay is:
>>>
>>> /dts-v1/;
>>> /plugin/;
>>> / {
>>> fragment@0 {
>>> target-path="/soc";
>>> __overlay__ {
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>> agpio0: agpio0 {
>>> compatible = "altr,pio-1.0";
>>> reg = <0xff210040 0x10>;
>>
>> Added some printks and got a bit further with debug. If I leave this
>> as-is, the platform device has 2 resources. We get the NULL pointer in
>> __release_resource() when releasing the first one (reg). If I remove
>> this one line ('reg =') the crash goes away. So in this case, we are
>> ok when releasing an irq resource but get a NULL pointer when removing
>> a reg resource. Don't know why at this point.
>
> The crash is confirmed on v4 patches as well. The immediate cause of the crash:
>
> static int __release_resource(struct resource *old)
> {
> struct resource *tmp, **p;
>
> p = &old->parent->child;
> for (;;) {
> tmp = *p; <===kablooey
> ...
>
> when __release_resource() is called for the reg resource, it does 'p =
> &olde->parent->child' and then crashes when it does 'tmp = *p'.
>
> Root cause: It appears that there isn't any code in drivers/of/ that
> eventually calls __request_resource() or __insert_resource() so the
> resource's parents/sibling pointers are never initialized. Maybe I'm
> missing some patches or something.
It's probably related to this issue:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fa.linux.kernel/CTx1ReiOjnQ
http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg63678.html
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists