| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <1397691337.7727.18.camel@kjgkr>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:35:37 +0900
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
To: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@...ras.ru>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Subject: Re: f2fs: BUG_ON() is triggered when mount valid f2fs filesystem
Hi,
2014-04-16 (수), 13:11 +0400, Andrey Tsyvarev:
> Hi,
>
> With this patch mounting of the image continues to fail (with similar
> BUG_ON).
> But when image is formatted again (and steps mentioned in the previous
> message are performed),
> mounting of it is now succeed.
>
> Is this is a true purpose of the patch?
Indeed. The patch solves there-in root cause.
But, if you're trying to use the failed image again, simply you can skip
the errorneous part by:
# mount ... -o disable_roll_forward ...
Once sync or umount whatever checkpoint is done after that, the image
will be mounted without "disable_roll_forward".
Thanks,
>
> 15.04.2014 15:04, Jaegeuk Kim пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for the report.
> > I retrieved the fault image and found out that previous garbage data
> > wreak such the wrong behaviors.
> > So, I wrote the following patch that fills one zero-block at the
> > checkpoint procedure.
> > If the underlying device supports discard, I expect that it mostly
> > doesn't incur any performance regression significantly.
> >
> > Could you test this patch?
> >
> > >From 60588ceb7277aae2a79e7f67f5217d1256720d78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
> > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:57:55 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid to conduct roll-forward due to the remained
> > garbage blocks
> >
> > The f2fs always scans the next chain of direct node blocks.
> > But some garbage blocks are able to be remained due to no discard
> > support or
> > SSR triggers.
> > This occasionally wreaks recovering wrong inodes that were used or
> > BUG_ONs
> > due to reallocating node ids as follows.
> >
> > When mount this f2fs image:
> > http://linuxtesting.org/downloads/f2fs_fault_image.zip
> > BUG_ON is triggered in f2fs driver (messages below are generated on
> > kernel 3.13.2; for other kernels output is similar):
> >
> > kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/node.c:215!
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffffa032ebad>] recover_inode_page+0x1fd/0x3e0 [f2fs]
> > [<ffffffff811446e7>] ? __lock_page+0x67/0x70
> > [<ffffffff81089990>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x50/0x50
> > [<ffffffffa0337788>] recover_fsync_data+0x1398/0x15d0 [f2fs]
> > [<ffffffff812b9e5c>] ? selinux_d_instantiate+0x1c/0x20
> > [<ffffffff811cb20b>] ? d_instantiate+0x5b/0x80
> > [<ffffffffa0321044>] f2fs_fill_super+0xb04/0xbf0 [f2fs]
> > [<ffffffff811b861e>] ? mount_bdev+0x7e/0x210
> > [<ffffffff811b8769>] mount_bdev+0x1c9/0x210
> > [<ffffffffa0320540>] ? validate_superblock+0x210/0x210 [f2fs]
> > [<ffffffffa031cf8d>] f2fs_mount+0x1d/0x30 [f2fs]
> > [<ffffffff811b9497>] mount_fs+0x47/0x1c0
> > [<ffffffff81166e00>] ? __alloc_percpu+0x10/0x20
> > [<ffffffff811d4032>] vfs_kern_mount+0x72/0x110
> > [<ffffffff811d6763>] do_mount+0x493/0x910
> > [<ffffffff811615cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
> > [<ffffffff811d6c70>] SyS_mount+0x90/0xe0
> > [<ffffffff8166f8d9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >
> > Found by Linux File System Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> >
> > Reported-by: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@...ras.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 6 ++++++
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 4aa521a..890e23d 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -762,6 +762,12 @@ static void do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > bool is_umount)
> > void *kaddr;
> > int i;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * This avoids to conduct wrong roll-forward operations and uses
> > + * metapages, so should be called prior to sync_meta_pages below.
> > + */
> > + discard_next_dnode(sbi);
> > +
> > /* Flush all the NAT/SIT pages */
> > while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META))
> > sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 2ecac83..2c5a5da 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> > void invalidate_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t);
> > void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t, block_t);
> > void clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> > +void discard_next_dnode(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> > int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> > void allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> > struct page *get_sum_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *, unsigned int);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 1e264e7..9993f94 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -335,13 +335,26 @@ static void locate_dirty_segment(struct
> > f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
> > mutex_unlock(&dirty_i->seglist_lock);
> > }
> >
> > -static void f2fs_issue_discard(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > +static int f2fs_issue_discard(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > block_t blkstart, block_t blklen)
> > {
> > sector_t start = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blkstart);
> > sector_t len = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blklen);
> > - blkdev_issue_discard(sbi->sb->s_bdev, start, len, GFP_NOFS, 0);
> > trace_f2fs_issue_discard(sbi->sb, blkstart, blklen);
> > + return blkdev_issue_discard(sbi->sb->s_bdev, start, len, GFP_NOFS, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void discard_next_dnode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > +{
> > + struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_WARM_NODE);
> > + block_t blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg);
> > +
> > + if (f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, blkaddr, 1)) {
> > + struct page *page = grab_meta_page(sbi, blkaddr);
> > + /* zero-filled page */
> > + set_page_dirty(page);
> > + f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void add_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists