[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140417134123.GA15749@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:41:23 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lpoetter@...hat.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kay@...hat.com,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PASSCGROUP to enable passing
cgroup path
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 01:24:32PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
[..]
> I'm not talking about the risk that someone learns someone's cgroup.
> I'm talking about the risk that a malicious program can get a lot
> entry like: "whatever planted text"
> _SYSTEMD_UNIT=non-malicious.service. That is, they've spoofed a log
> line.
>
> If you don't care about spoofing of log lines, then there's no point
> to having the kernel validate them anyway.
What's wrong with this. A message came from a cgroup which maps to
a unit xyz and it got logged. I can't see what's wrong here.
Anyway that message will get logged with unit information. These patches
will just make getting unit information race free and more reliable.
Thansk
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists