[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140417160828.GP15326@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:08:28 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: rescuer_thread() processes all pwqs
before exit
Hello, Lai.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:04:29AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > I don't think this is reliable. What if mayday requests take place
> > between wq_mayday_lock and kthread_should_stop() check? We'll
> > probably need to run through mayday list after checking should_stop.
>
> It is destroy_workqueue()'s responsibility to avoid this.
> destroy_workqueue() should drain all works and refuse any new work queued
> on the wq before destroy the wq.
>
> So since there is no works, there is no new mayday request,
> and there is no mayday request take place between wq_mayday_lock
> and kthread_should_stop() check.
Hmmm? Isn't this the same race condition that you tried to remove by
relocating the test? It doesn't matter what destroy_workqueue() does,
the rescuer may get preempted inbetween and anything can happen
inbetween including someone maydaying and initiation of
destroy_workqueue(). Your patch doesn't change the situation at all.
It can still return with non-empty mayday list.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists