[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140417172246.GA9849@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:23:49 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/19] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV
support
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:52AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> v8->v9:
> - Integrate PeterZ's version of the queue spinlock patch with some
> modification:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org
> - Break the more complex patches into smaller ones to ease review effort.
> - Fix a racing condition in the PV qspinlock code.
I am not seeing anything mentioning that the overcommit scenario
for KVM and Xen had been fixed. Or was the 'racing condition' said
issue?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists