[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53505BD7.9050004@meduna.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:55:19 +0200
From: Stanislav Meduna <stano@...una.org>
To: "linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
triplesquarednine@...il.com
CC: Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP - reverting timer patches
helps
On 17.04.2014 18:29, Stanislav Meduna wrote:
> Note: the bug goes away reverting the very same patches that are
> helping the Jordan's problms. I did follow
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg11639.html
>
> and no BUG while booting anymore. I'll try to let it run some
> more time.
Erm.. nope
# (cat /proc/meminfo ; cat /proc/meminfo) | grep KernelStack
KernelStack: 5920 kB
KernelStack: 5928 kB
# (cat /proc/meminfo ; cat /proc/meminfo) | grep KernelStack
KernelStack: 5952 kB
KernelStack: 5960 kB
maybe interrupt nesting ad nauseum? How does one debug
such issues?
It is possible that my previous posting was also caused by this -
disregard, I'll post again if the problem persists.
Jordan, could you check whether your kernel stack remains
stable with only the 3 patches reverted?
Thanks
--
Stano
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists