linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] drivers/base: add managed token devres interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5350634A.2030608@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:27:06 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, m.chehab@...sung.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux@...ck-us.net, toshi.kani@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	shuahkhan@...il.com, Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] drivers/base: add managed token devres interfaces

On 04/17/2014 02:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 04:10:34PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
Please do not implement locking
> primitive directly if at all avoidable.  Why can't it use a mutex
> embedded in the data area of a devres entry?  And if you for some
> reason have to implement it directly, at least add lockdep
> annotations.
>

Thanks. This is helpful. Yes it does simplify the code with mutex
embedded in the devres data area. I am working on a v2 patch with
that change.

-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/