lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:08:10 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	<mhocko@...e.cz>, <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <glommer@...il.com>,
	<cl@...ux-foundation.org>, <penberg@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -mm v2 0/3] kmemcg: simplify work-flow (was "memcg-vs-slab
 cleanup")

On 04/18/2014 12:04 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hi Michal, Johannes,
>
> This patch-set is a part of preparations for kmemcg re-parenting. It
> targets at simplifying kmemcg work-flows and synchronization.
>
> First, it removes async per memcg cache destruction (see patches 1, 2).
> Now caches are only destroyed on memcg offline. That means the caches
> that are not empty on memcg offline will be leaked. However, they are
> already leaked, because memcg_cache_params::nr_pages normally never
> drops to 0 so the destruction work is never scheduled except
> kmem_cache_shrink is called explicitly. In the future I'm planning
> reaping such dead caches on vmpressure or periodically.
>
> Second, it substitutes per memcg slab_caches_mutex's with the global
> memcg_slab_mutex, which should be taken during the whole per memcg cache
> creation/destruction path before the slab_mutex (see patch 3). This
> greatly simplifies synchronization among various per memcg cache
> creation/destruction paths.

v1 can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/9/298

Changes in v2:
  - substitute per memcg slab_caches_mutex's with the global
    memcg_slab_mutex and re-split the set.

>
> I really need your help, because I'm far not sure if what I'm doing here
> is right. So I would appreciate if you could look through the patches
> and share your thoughts about the design changes they introduce.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vladimir Davydov (3):
>    memcg, slab: do not schedule cache destruction when last page goes
>      away
>    memcg, slab: merge memcg_{bind,release}_pages to
>      memcg_{un}charge_slab
>    memcg, slab: simplify synchronization scheme
>
>   include/linux/memcontrol.h |   15 +--
>   include/linux/slab.h       |    8 +-
>   mm/memcontrol.c            |  231 +++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>   mm/slab.c                  |    2 -
>   mm/slab.h                  |   28 +-----
>   mm/slab_common.c           |   22 ++---
>   mm/slub.c                  |    2 -
>   7 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ