[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140418165705.GE12515@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:57:05 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...bit.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] idr: fix unexpected id-removal when
idr_remove(unallocated_id)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:49:49PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> If unallocated_id = (ANY * idr_max(idp->layers) + existed_id) is passed
existing_id
> to idr_remove(). The existed_id will be removed unexpected.
ditto.
>
> The following test shows this unexpected id-removal:
>
> static void test4(void)
> {
> int id;
> DEFINE_IDR(test_idr);
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "Start test4\n");
> id = idr_alloc(&test_idr, (void *)1, 42, 43, GFP_KERNEL);
> BUG_ON(id != 42);
> idr_remove(&test_idr, 42 + IDR_SIZE);
> TEST_BUG_ON(idr_find(&test_idr, 42) != (void *)1);
> idr_destroy(&test_idr);
> printk(KERN_INFO "End of test4\n");
> }
>
> It only happens when unallocated_id, it is caller's fault. It is not
> a bug. But it is better to add the proper check and complains instead
complain
> of removing an existed_id silently.
existing_id
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists