linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] idr: covert BUG_ON() to WARN_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140418171420.GD23576@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:14:20 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...bit.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] idr: covert BUG_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() if the
 argument is invalid.

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:49:52PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> @@ -1135,7 +1136,7 @@ void ida_simple_remove(struct ida *ida, unsigned int id)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	BUG_ON((int)id < 0);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE((int)id < 0);

Shouldn't this be moved to ida_remove()?  Also, it probably should
return afterwards?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/