[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140418182614.GH29210@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:26:14 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: mhocko@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, glommer@...il.com,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -mm v2 3/3] memcg, slab: simplify synchronization
scheme
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:08:17PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On 04/18/2014 06:17 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > I like this patch, but the API names are confusing. Could we fix up
> > that whole thing by any chance? Some suggestions below, but they
> > might only be marginally better...
>
> Yeah, names are inconsistent in kmemcg and desperately want improvement:
>
> mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches
> kmem_cgroup_css_offline
> memcg_kmem_get_cache
> memcg_charge_kmem
> memcg_create_cache_name
>
> I've been thinking on cleaning this up for some time, but couldn't make
> up my mind to do this. I think it cannot wait any more now, so my next
> patch set will rework kmemcg naming.
>
> Can we apply this patch as is for now? It'd be more convenient for me to
> rework naming on top of the end picture.
Yes, absolutely. For this patch:
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists