[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53517BC5.7090002@web.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:23:49 +0200
From: Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@....de>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 3/4] blk-mq: user (1 << order) to implement order_to_size()
Ming Lei wrote, on 04/18/2014 17:47:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@....de> wrote:
>> Ming Lei wrote, on 04/17/2014 17:49:
>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> block/blk-mq.c | 7 +------
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>>> index baff2d0..1eff3d9 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>>> @@ -1130,12 +1130,7 @@ static void blk_mq_free_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>>>
>>> static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
>>> {
>>> - size_t ret = PAGE_SIZE;
>>> -
>>> - while (order--)
>>> - ret *= 2;
>>> -
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return (1 << order) * PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>> Shouldn't this be
>>
>> return ((size_t)1 << order) * PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>> ?
>
> IMO, it isn't necessary since compiler will cast type
> of 1 and the expression to size_t automatically.
>
>
> Thanks,
Testing this with gcc 4.8.2 with order > 30 confirms that the automatic casting
is done operator-wise and the explicit casting is necessary.
Regards,
jvp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists