[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140420075936.GA19672@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:59:37 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com,
kim.naru@....com, daniel@...ascale.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, bp@...e.de,
sp@...ascale.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/PCI: Support additional MMIO range
capabilities
Drop Andreas' old email address from CC as it keeps bouncing.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 03:52:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > -static void __init pci_enable_pci_io_ecs(void)
> > +static void __init pci_enable_pci_io_ecs(u8 bus, u8 slot)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NB
> > unsigned int i, n;
> > + u8 limit;
> >
> > for (n = i = 0; !n && amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit; ++i) {
> > - u8 bus = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].bus;
> > - u8 slot = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_base;
> > - u8 limit = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit;
> > + /* Try matching for the bus range */
> > + if ((bus != amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].bus) ||
> > + (slot != amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_base))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + limit = amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[i].dev_limit;
> >
> > + /* Setup all northbridges within the range */
> > for (; slot < limit; ++slot) {
> > u32 val = read_pci_config(bus, slot, 3, 0);
> > -
> > - if (!early_is_amd_nb(val))
> > + if (!val)
> > continue;
> >
> > val = read_pci_config(bus, slot, 3, 0x8c);
> > @@ -375,13 +457,14 @@ static void __init pci_enable_pci_io_ecs(void)
> > val |= ENABLE_CF8_EXT_CFG >> 32;
>
> What a fun shifting!
>
> Maybe you should do
>
> #define ENABLE_CF8_EXT_CFG BIT(46 - 32)
>
> to show exactly what you mean and how the bit is defined in MSR NB_CFG1
> and also show how the high 32-bits are mapped into F3x8c, while at it.
>
> And then you can drop the shifting at the call site.
Ok, I see another fun with this ECS enabling:
There's a enable_pci_io_ecs() which enables ECS through the NB_CFG MSR
which is called as part of the notifier *and* there's a PCI write to
that same bit in pci_enable_pci_io_ecs() which iterates over all NBs.
So, AFAICT, we do it twice and the second time is not needed. Which
means, you probably can drop pci_enable_pci_io_ecs() completely and use
solely the notifier?
Yes, no?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists