linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/2] fs,proc: Respect FMODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140421163058.GS18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:30:58 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] fs,proc: Respect FMODE_WRITE when opening
 /proc/pid/fd/N

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:22:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> +static int proc_may_follow(struct nameidata *nd, struct file *f)
> +{
> +	if (!nd)
> +		return 0;  /* This is readlink, */
> +
> +	if ((nd->flags & LOOKUP_WRITE) && !(f->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

And this is just plain wrong.  WTF are you making the traversal of symlink
in the middle of pathname dependent on the open flags?

NAK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/