linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/compaction: cleanup isolate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:41:46 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Dongjun Shin <d.j.shin@...sung.com>,
	Sunghwan Yun <sunghwan.yun@...sung.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/compaction: cleanup isolate_freepages()

On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:07:45 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hi Vlastimil,
> 
> Below just nitpicks.

It seems you were ignored ;)

> >  {
> >  	struct page *page;
> > -	unsigned long high_pfn, low_pfn, pfn, z_end_pfn;
> > +	unsigned long pfn, low_pfn, next_free_pfn, z_end_pfn;
> 
> Could you add comment for each variable?
> 
> unsigned long pfn; /* scanning cursor */
> unsigned long low_pfn; /* lowest pfn free scanner is able to scan */
> unsigned long next_free_pfn; /* start pfn for scaning at next truen */
> unsigned long z_end_pfn; /* zone's end pfn */
> 
> 
> > @@ -688,11 +688,10 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
> >  	low_pfn = ALIGN(cc->migrate_pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages);
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Take care that if the migration scanner is at the end of the zone
> > -	 * that the free scanner does not accidentally move to the next zone
> > -	 * in the next isolation cycle.
> > +	 * Seed the value for max(next_free_pfn, pfn) updates. If there are
> > +	 * none, the pfn < low_pfn check will kick in.
> 
>        "none" what? I'd like to clear more.

I did this:

--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-cleanup-isolate_freepages-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -662,7 +662,10 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zon
 				struct compact_control *cc)
 {
 	struct page *page;
-	unsigned long pfn, low_pfn, next_free_pfn, z_end_pfn;
+	unsigned long pfn;	     /* scanning cursor */
+	unsigned long low_pfn;	     /* lowest pfn scanner is able to scan */
+	unsigned long next_free_pfn; /* start pfn for scaning at next round */
+	unsigned long z_end_pfn;     /* zone's end pfn */
 	int nr_freepages = cc->nr_freepages;
 	struct list_head *freelist = &cc->freepages;
 
@@ -679,8 +682,8 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zon
 	low_pfn = ALIGN(cc->migrate_pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages);
 
 	/*
-	 * Seed the value for max(next_free_pfn, pfn) updates. If there are
-	 * none, the pfn < low_pfn check will kick in.
+	 * Seed the value for max(next_free_pfn, pfn) updates. If no pages are
+	 * isolated, the pfn < low_pfn check will kick in.
 	 */
 	next_free_pfn = 0;
 
> > @@ -766,9 +765,9 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
> >  	 * so that compact_finished() may detect this
> >  	 */
> >  	if (pfn < low_pfn)
> > -		cc->free_pfn = max(pfn, zone->zone_start_pfn);
> > -	else
> > -		cc->free_pfn = high_pfn;
> > +		next_free_pfn = max(pfn, zone->zone_start_pfn);
> 
> Why we need max operation?
> IOW, what's the problem if we do (next_free_pfn = pfn)?

An answer to this would be useful, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/