[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJFM1e2Y7GykK06KuZ8fD8iZ=64W1i+tqibJ9datCUR0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:05:29 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] driver-core: Remove dummy 'platform_bus'
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
> directory to put platform devices into. However, it really doesn't make
> sense to segregate all the platform devices into a sub directory when
> typically they are memory mapped devices that doen't go through any
> particular bus. Particularly on embedded type platforms the platform_bus
> directory doesn't add anything.
>
> However, this will probably just end up breaking some userspace that
> depends on the /sys/devices/platform/ path to be present (no matter how
> much we protest that userspace must not depend on paths in sysfs). So
> while I'm seriously proposing this change, it may just be unacceptable
> ABI breakage
An old thread, but was there ever a conclusion to this? We now have a
mixture of using platform_bus as the parent or not on various ARM
platforms.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists