[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1404221949510.980@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Liu Hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>, will.deacon@....com, vitalya@...com,
cyril@...com, santosh.shilimkar@...com, lauraa@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wangnan0@...wei.com, peifeiyue@...wei.com, liusdu@....co
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] change ARM linux memory layout to support 32
CPUs
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 07:06:05PM +0800, Liu Hua wrote:
> > This patch series change fixmap mapping region to suppport 32 CPUs.
> > Because the "top_pmd" covers 0xfffe0000 - 0xffffffff(2M). And part
> > is used by vector table. So I move this region down to 0xffc00000
> > - 0xffdffff.
>
> Can you explain why you have submitted these patches to my patch tracker
> with a copy to stable@...r.kernel.org ?
>
> What makes these qualify for stable tree inclusion? What regression are
> they fixing?
>
> We don't put patches into the stable tree for things that /never/ worked
> in the past. We've never supported 32 CPUs so I don't think these
> qualify.
Indeed. The stable qualifier should be dropped.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists