linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: LLVMLinux: Wrap -mno-80387 with cc-option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53560AF2.8000106@converseincode.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:23:46 -0700
From:	Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: LLVMLinux: Wrap -mno-80387 with cc-option

On 04/21/14 23:05, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * behanw@...verseincode.com <behanw@...verseincode.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
>>
>> Wrap -mno-80387 gcc options with cc-option so they don't break clang.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/Makefile | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
>> index d1b7c37..ce6ad7e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
>> @@ -83,7 +83,9 @@ else
>>           KBUILD_CFLAGS += -m64
>>   
>>           # Don't autogenerate traditional x87, MMX or SSE instructions
>> -        KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-mmx -mno-sse -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387
>> +        KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-mmx -mno-sse
>> +        KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-80387)
>> +        KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-fp-ret-in-387)
> Is there a clang equivalent option that inhibits all things FPU opcode
> generation by the compiler?
Not that I've found yet. Still investigating.

> That's the general purpose of -no-80387.
Yes, I understand what this is trying to accomplish. At this point I'd 
just like this new code not to break the use of clang with v3.15.

I will submit another patch which adds similar functionality when 
compiled with clang once I have that answer.

Behan

-- 
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/