[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHz2CGXsvdtVdwZfyFAwtRHJ_vkeJZXtLv4fTGTYEeEwN7H6Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:01:04 +0800
From: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field
Hi, hillf,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> But other fields still missed, if any. Fair?
yep, it is not fair.
Sure for this global variable struct, if not initailized, its all
fields will be initialized
to 0 or null(depending on its type). The point here is no to deprive
the rights of
compiler/linker of doing this initialization, it is mainly for
documentation reason.
Actually this field's value would affect how ->css_alloc should implemented.
Concretely, if early_init is nonzero, then ->css_alloc *must not* call kzalloc,
because in cgroup implementation, ->css_alloc will be called earlier before
mm_init().
I don't think that the value of one field(early_init) has a so subtle
restrition on the
another field(css_alloc) is a good thing, but since it is there,
docment it should
be needed.
Thanks,
Jianyu Zhan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists