[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140422071541.GA17657@lee--X1>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:15:41 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry
macro for iteration
> The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper
> for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it.
>
> It should have no functional changes.
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
> ---
It would be good to have a changelog which describes the differences
between the versions, so we can keep track.
> drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
So it looks like I already applied v2 of this patch to my tree. What
changed in v3 and v4? Should I remove that patch from MFD and apply
this one instead?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists