linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 06/12] mmc: mmci: Add write delay to variant structure.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:15:31 +0100
From:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:	balbi@...com
CC:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agross@...cinc.com,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/12] mmc: mmci: Add write delay to variant structure.

Thanks Felipe,

On 21/04/14 23:08, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> +	if (var->reg_write_delay && host->mclk)
>> >+		udelay(1 + ((var->reg_write_delay * USEC_PER_SEC)/host->mclk));
> looks like this should be quirk flag instead of a write delay... No
> strong feelings though, but it looks like the following would be better,
> perhaps:
>
> 	if (host_is_qualcom(host))
> 		udelay(1 + ((3 * USEC_PER_SEC)/host->mclk));
Am ok with your proposal. I was wondering if someone else might need it 
in future.
If not I could change it as you suggested.

Thanks,
srini
>
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/