[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5356499A.20609@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:51:06 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC: lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mcpm: exynos: populate suspend and powered_up callbacks
On 04/21/2014 01:49 PM, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> In order to support cpuidle through mcpm, suspend and powered-up
> callbacks are required in mcpm platform code.
> Hence populate the same callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> index 46d4968..16af0bd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
> @@ -318,10 +318,63 @@ static int exynos_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
> return 0; /* success: the CPU is halted */
> }
>
> +static void enable_coherency(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long v, u;
> +
> + asm volatile(
> + "mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> + "orr %0, %0, %2\n"
> + "ldr %1, [%3]\n"
> + "and %1, %1, #0\n"
> + "orr %0, %0, %1\n"
> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
> + : "=&r" (v), "=&r" (u)
> + : "Ir" (0x40), "Ir" (S5P_INFORM0)
> + : "cc");
> +}
Shouldn't this function to be used from hotplug.c also ?
> +
> +void exynos_powered_up(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster;
> +
> + mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> + cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> + cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> +
> + arch_spin_lock(&bl_lock);
> + if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 0)
> + cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] = 1;
> + arch_spin_unlock(&bl_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos_suspend(u64 residency)
> +{
> + unsigned int mpidr, cpunr;
> +
> + mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> + cpunr = enynos_pmu_cpunr(mpidr);
*enynos*_pmu_cpunr ?
> +
> + __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(mcpm_entry_point), REG_ENTRY_ADDR);
> +
> + exynos_power_down();
> +
> + /*
> + * Execution reaches here only if cpu did not power down.
> + * Hence roll back the changes done in exynos_power_down function.
> + */
> + __raw_writel(EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN,
> + EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpunr));
Why don't you use the functions defined in the
patch 5/5 arm: exynos: Add MCPM call-back functions
exynos_core_power_control() ?
> + set_cr(get_cr() | CR_C);
> + enable_coherency();
> +}
> +
> static const struct mcpm_platform_ops exynos_power_ops = {
> .power_up = exynos_power_up,
> .power_down = exynos_power_down,
> .power_down_finish = exynos_power_down_finish,
> + .suspend = exynos_suspend,
> + .powered_up = exynos_powered_up,
> };
>
> static void __init exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init(void)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists