[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHz2CGUZyv-dvUUoSi2Vk_vgPAMqRN4yEg4F4XsKQ8udHeo2bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:58:11 +0800
From: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memcontrol.c: remove meaningless while loop in mem_cgroup_iter()
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more specific that I was talking about
> mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie path where the iteration for this particular
> zone and priority ended at the last node without finishing the full
> roundtrip last time. This new iteration (prev==NULL) wants to continue
> and it should start a new roundtrip.
>
> Makes sense?
Hi, Michal,
Good catch, it makes sense !
This reminds me of my draft edition of this patch, I specifically handle
this case as:
if (reclaim) {
if (!memcg ) {
iter->generation++;
if (!prev) {
memcg = root;
mem_cgroup_iter_update(iter, NULL,
memcg, root, seq);
goto out_unlock:
}
}
mem_cgroup_iter_update(iter, last_visited, memcg, root,
seq);
if (!prev && memcg)
reclaim->generation = iter->generation;
}
This is literally manual unwinding the second while loop, and thus omit
the while loop,
to save a mem_cgroup_iter_update() and a mem_cgroup_iter_update()
But it maybe a bit hard to read.
If it is OK, I could resend a new one.
Thanks,
Jianyu Zhan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists