[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140422120948.GT12304@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:09:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Chew Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.chew@...el.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Pass host clock rate info from PCI
glue layer
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:57:17PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 05:30:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > As you mention we already have a clock API for passing around
> > information about clocks, it would be much better to fix the fact that
> > this isn't enabled on x86 than to add custom code to deal with clocks
> > (even simple things like this) - this is far from the only place where
> > it causes issues.
> We actually have clock API enabled on x86 if CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS is
> selected.
Why is this conditional? It's really unhelpful for writing generic code
handling clocks that the API isn't available as standard. Allowing the
user to disable it if it's not required makes sense but not making it
available at all is just unhelpful.
> In this case the question is more like, where do we create clocks for PCI
> enumerated devices? Surely we don't want to have board files to do this.
> In ACPI mode, we do it in drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c but not sure where we
> could do that in PCI code.
As far as I can tell the clock here is part of the same glue that allows
the generic pxa2xx support to be instantiated from PCI. I would
therefore expect the glue to also instantiate the clock. Or if it's a
standard PCI clock then perhaps the PCI subsystem ought to be providing
it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists