lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:07:51 +0800
From:	Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, zeus@....org,
	aswin@...com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"open list:CAN NETWORK DRIVERS <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, open
	list:NETWORKING DRIVERS <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, open list" 
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	bfin <adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] blackfin/ptrace: call find_vma with the mmap_sem held

Hi Davidlohr,

On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> wrote:
> Performing vma lookups without taking the mm->mmap_sem is asking
> for trouble. While doing the search, the vma in question can be
> modified or even removed before returning to the caller. Take the
> lock (shared) in order to avoid races while iterating through the
> vmacache and/or rbtree.
Yes, mm->mmap_sem should lock here. Applied, thanks.
>
> This patch is completely *untested*.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
> Cc: adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> ---
>  arch/blackfin/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/blackfin/kernel/ptrace.c
> index e1f88e0..8b8fe67 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ put_reg(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long regno, unsigned long data)
>  int
>  is_user_addr_valid(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
>  {
> +       bool valid;
>         struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>         struct sram_list_struct *sraml;
>
> @@ -124,9 +125,12 @@ is_user_addr_valid(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long start, unsigned long
>         if (start + len < start)
>                 return -EIO;
>
> +       down_read(&child->mm->mmap_sem);
>         vma = find_vma(child->mm, start);
> -       if (vma && start >= vma->vm_start && start + len <= vma->vm_end)
> -                       return 0;
> +       valid = vma && start >= vma->vm_start && start + len <= vma->vm_end;
> +       up_read(&child->mm->mmap_sem);
> +       if (valid)
> +               return 0;
>
>         for (sraml = child->mm->context.sram_list; sraml; sraml = sraml->next)
>                 if (start >= (unsigned long)sraml->addr
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
-steven
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ