linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W71HQyua8=aq8gb12hvnSYGPYGuEcQZ=3=iVUNiAaXcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:28:44 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by
 adding retries

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable
>> > branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the
>> > next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or
>> > receive a pull-request from Mark with mine applied.
>>
>> > Up to Mark.
>>
>> Well, Doug didn't send me the MFD patch so I can't do anything with it
>> anyway.
>
> Ah!
>
> Doug,
>   what exactly are the dependencies within the set?

I will repost the patch shortly with Mark on the CC list.  Status of
the patches in this series:

- Patch #1 (mfd no irq) has no dependencies, though patch #2 won't
  work without it.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004441/

Acked by you.  Not landed anywhere that I'm aware of.

--

- Patch #2 (charger polling) can be applied without patch #1 but won't
  actually make charger polling work without it.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004461/

Not acked or applied anywhere.

---

- Patch #3 (caching) can be applied before retries patch but not
  after.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4033361/

This is the patch we need.  I just resent with Mark on the CC list
(including your ack).

---

- Patch #4 (overcurrent wait time) can be applied before retries patch
  but not after (just due to merge conflicts, no other reason).

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004471/

I believe Mark has already applied.

---

- Patch #5 (retries) absolutely requires patch #3 (caching).

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004521/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/