linux-kernel - Re: [libata/ahci] 8a4aeec8d2d: +138.4% perf-stat.dTLB-store-misses, +37.2% perf-stat.dTLB-load-misses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:11:56 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkp@...org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [libata/ahci] 8a4aeec8d2d: +138.4% perf-stat.dTLB-store-misses,
 +37.2% perf-stat.dTLB-load-misses

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> HI Dan,
>
> we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata for-next
> commit 8a4aeec8d2d6a3edeffbdfae451cdf05cbf0fefd ("libata/ahci: accommodate
> tag ordered controllers")

Hi, was this on simulated hardware or a real AHCI controller and disk?

It does appear this test noticed increased throughput:

    203893 ~ 0%      +3.7%     211474 ~ 0%  TOTAL iostat.sda.wkB/s

I wonder if ap->last_tag can be moved to a hotter cacheline, but if
throughput goes up I can imagine it throws off the cpu statistics
quite a bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/