[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwuKTQGHzi-cFkHrkLgkS-kFptajFt4=ginxOgwDcJLrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:19:46 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: espfix for 64-bit mode *PROTOTYPE*
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Anyway, if done correctly, this whole espfix should be totally free
>> for normal processes, since it should only trigger if SS is a LDT
>> entry (bit #2 set in the segment descriptor). So the normal fast-path
>> should just have a simple test for that.
>
> How? Doesn't something still need to check whether SS is funny before
> doing iret?
Just test bit #2. Don't do anything else if it's clear, because you
should be done. You don't need to do anything special if it's clear,
because I don't *think* we have any 16-bit data segments in the GDT on
x86-64.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists