[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5356A5EB.6010702@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:24:59 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: espfix for 64-bit mode *PROTOTYPE*
On 04/22/2014 10:20 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> It won't, given the above. I misunderstood what you were checking.
>
> It still seems to me that only #GP needs this special handling. The
> IST entries should never run on the espfix stack, and #MC, #DB, #NM,
> and #SS (I missed that one earlier) use IST.
>
> Would it ever make sense to make #GP use IST as well? That might
> allow espfix_adjust_stack to be removed entirely. I don't know how
> much other fiddling would be needed to make that work.
>
Interesting thought. It might even be able to share an IST entry with #SS.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists