[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398190871.2473.12.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:21:11 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
gthelen@...gle.com, aswin@...com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ipc/shm.c: Increase the defaults for SHMALL, SHMMAX.
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 16:26 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> System V shared memory
>
> a) can be abused to trigger out-of-memory conditions and the standard
> measures against out-of-memory do not work:
>
> - it is not possible to use setrlimit to limit the size of shm segments.
>
> - segments can exist without association with any processes, thus
> the oom-killer is unable to free that memory.
>
> b) is typically used for shared information - today often multiple GB.
> (e.g. database shared buffers)
>
> The current default is a maximum segment size of 32 MB and a maximum total
> size of 8 GB. This is often too much for a) and not enough for b), which
> means that lots of users must change the defaults.
>
> This patch increases the default limits (nearly) to the maximum, which is
> perfect for case b). The defaults are used after boot and as the initial
> value for each new namespace.
>
> Admins/distros that need a protection against a) should reduce the limits
> and/or enable shm_rmid_forced.
>
> Further notes:
> - The patch only changes default, overrides behave as before:
> # sysctl kernel.shmall=33554432
> would recreate the previous limit for SHMMAX (for the current namespace).
>
> - Disabling sysv shm allocation is possible with:
> # sysctl kernel.shmall=0
> (not a new feature, also per-namespace)
>
> - The limits are intentionally set to a value slightly less than ULONG_MAX,
> to avoid triggering overflows in user space apps.
> [not unreasonable, see http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=139638334330127]
>
> Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
> Reported-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
With one comment below.
> ---
> include/linux/shm.h | 3 +--
> include/uapi/linux/shm.h | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/shm.h b/include/linux/shm.h
> index 1e2cd2e..57d7770 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shm.h
> @@ -3,9 +3,8 @@
>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/shm.h>
> -
> -#define SHMALL (SHMMAX/PAGE_SIZE*(SHMMNI/16)) /* max shm system wide (pages) */
> #include <asm/shmparam.h>
> +
> struct shmid_kernel /* private to the kernel */
> {
> struct kern_ipc_perm shm_perm;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/shm.h b/include/uapi/linux/shm.h
> index 78b6941..74e786d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/shm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/shm.h
> @@ -9,15 +9,13 @@
>
> /*
> * SHMMAX, SHMMNI and SHMALL are upper limits are defaults which can
> - * be increased by sysctl
> + * be modified by sysctl.
> */
>
> -#define SHMMAX 0x2000000 /* max shared seg size (bytes) */
> #define SHMMIN 1 /* min shared seg size (bytes) */
> #define SHMMNI 4096 /* max num of segs system wide */
> -#ifndef __KERNEL__
> -#define SHMALL (SHMMAX/getpagesize()*(SHMMNI/16))
> -#endif
> +#define SHMMAX (ULONG_MAX - (1L<<24)) /* max shared seg size (bytes) */
> +#define SHMALL (ULONG_MAX - (1L<<24)) /* max shm system wide (pages) */
It's quite clear in the changelog, but could you please add a big fat
comment explaining this option, and that there's no point in enlarging
it. In fact if the user wants to make it bigger, we should display some
printk_once mentioning that this is the upper limit.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists