[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140422195821.GB2314@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:58:21 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...bit.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] idr: reduce the number of MAX_IDR_FREE
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 06:16:19PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> +/*
> + * Number of idr_layer structs to leave in free list.
> + * When idr is not empty, we need atmost (MAX_IDR_LEVEL - 1) idr_layers
> + * to build up and atmost (MAX_IDR_LEVEL - 1) idr_layers to allocate down.
> + * When idr is empty need atmost MAX_IDR_LEVEL layers.
> + */
> +#define MAX_IDR_FREE max((MAX_IDR_LEVEL * 2 - 2), MAX_IDR_LEVEL)
I don't know. Do we really wanna be this sophiscated about it when
the cost of mistake would be an unexpected id allocation failure which
would *EXTREMELY* difficult to track down or reproduce? Let's please
keep it dumb and safe. With preloading we aren't even caching it
per-idr. I don't think this is something we want to do.
Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists