[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140422200449.GF11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:04:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] sched: fix possible invalid memory access caused by CPU
hot-addition
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:01:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:15:15 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:27:15PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > > When calling kzalloc_node(size, flags, node), we should first check
> > > whether node is onlined, otherwise it may cause invalid memory access
> > > as below.
> >
> > But this is only for memory less node crap, right?
>
> um, why are memoryless nodes crap?
Why wouldn't they be? Having CPUs with no local memory seems decidedly
suboptimal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists